Worley base case baseless but coal seam gas still worse than coal

A new WorleyParsons report states that gas plants can have higher emissions than even the worst coal plants, but under-estimates the problem by relying on misleading assumptions.

Understating the true level of coal seam gas (CSG) emissions will lead to massive gas fields being approved erroneously. It will also allow companies, including major clients of WorleyParsons, to avoid hundreds of millions of dollars through carbon liabilities that would need to be paid if emissions were properly accounted for.

"Deliberately failing to measure and ignoring potentially massive carbon liabilities is tax evasion" said Matthew Wright Executive Director of climate and energy security think-tank Beyond Zero Emissions.

This report illustrates the clear need for a comprehensive INDEPENDENT measurement and research of lifecycle emissions of gas. It is simply not adequate for government and investors to rely on research from companies with half a billion dollar contracts with oil and gas proponents, who would benefit enormously from underestimation of emissions.

WorleyParsons has a $500 million contract to develop an LNG field for QGC.

Feature: Learning from Spain’s HSR success

Australia has much to learn from the success of Spain’s Alta Velocidad Española (AVE) high-speed rail network, writes Matthew Wright, executive director, Beyond Zero Emissions.

The Spanish know how to get around in style and at speed. The country can boast it has the most comfortable, fast and frequent intercity travel service of any nation.

Where Japan has the highest patronage, Spain has speed; where the French have a comprehensive network, Spain has one longer.

RenewEconomy: South Australia’s big win with wind

Wind Power in South Australia has been a howling success; it now provides more electricity in the state than coal and in just a decade the wind industry has developed into one of the world’s leaders – and all to the benefit of South Australians.

Back in 1998 when the National Electricity Market was formed, South Australian generators charged more for electricity than generators in any of the other states. Today South Australian electricity is at its lowest price since the creation of the NEM and that is largely because of its choice to significantly develop its wind resources.

Wind Power costs a lot less than the savings it makes – it’s like a preventative measure; an insurance that you buy against high electricity prices. In the case of South Australia, they did just that and it paid off. According to the Essential Service Commission of South Australia wind power adds just 0.366c per kWh to the average South Australian electricity bill or just on 1 per cent (based on AEMC 2013/2014 South Australian 32c retail rate) The oft claimed outrageously high cost of wind is just $18.00 a year per household.

BZE submission to the Draft Energy White Paper now available

To download the submission click here.


Australia must rapidly decarbonise its economy if it is to play a constructive role in global efforts to address the climate change challenge. Present atmospheric levels of CO2 are at 390ppm1 and must be brought down to 350ppm to stay within the 2°C warming “guardrail.

Blessed with vast renewable energy resources, Australia can decarbonise its economy principally through the large-scale rollout of commercially available renewable energy technologies. The Zero Carbon Australia Stationary Energy plan, a research partnership between Beyond Zero Emissions and the University of Melbourne’s Energy Research Institute, demonstrates the technical feasibility of shifting to a 100 percent renewable energy system in ten years. It identifies Concentrating Solar Thermal and wind power as the primary technologies for a zero-carbon stationary energy sector.

BZE submission to the Victorian Feed-in Tariff Inquiry now available

To download the submission click here.

(Please note: the file sometimes has trouble loading in Firefox, if it doesn't work please try pasting the link into the Chrome browser)


Beyond Zero Emissions recognises the importance and efficacy of Feed in Tariffs and
distributed renewable generation in reducing emissions and moving towards a zero emission
future. We welcome the opportunity to respond to the Victorian Competition and Efficiency
Commission’s Inquiry into Feed-in Tariffs & Barriers to Distributed Generation.

The Issues Paper identifies two main elements to be addressed: “assessing the design, efficiency,
effectiveness and future of FiT schemes” and  “identifying barriers to connecting distributed
renewable and low emission technologies into the distribution system”.  We would agree the
importance of these objectives, and the (arguably even more important)  subsequent actions:
implementation of an effective feed in tariff and removal of barriers to distributed generation.

Unfortunately, we believe the following discussion within the Issues Paper misses some key
points with respect to distributed generation, and misrepresents the costs of distributed solar
photovoltaics (or other distributed generation ) and feed in tariffs. In this submission we firstly
identify some of the shortfalls, misrepresentations and missed concepts in the Issues Paper, and
then also answer the ‘Information Requests’.

The key issues include:

  • Incorrect use of Productivity Commission analysis
  • Analysis methodology is not suitable for distributed generation (does not value distributed generation at the retail price with which it competes)
  • Use of outdated Productivity Commission analysis (Incorporates outdated cost data)
  • Failure to acknowledge the ‘Merit Order Effect’, a key Feed in Tariff cost offset
  • Failure to acknowledge the inherent market failure with the carbon price mechanism
  • Failure to accept efficacy of Feed in Tariffs and distributed renewable generation in reducing emissions and moving towards a zero emission future.
  • Consideration of fossil gas as a feasible distributed technology

To keep reading, please click here (use Chrome if Firefox doesn't work)

Gas: not a transition fuel, more a fossil fuel prison cell

I'd much rather see a fleet of dirty old coal plants spewing out CO2 emissions than one newly built combined cycle gas plant.

Transition Coal should be a new uniting catch-cry of environmentalists. Transition Coal's time is now, following on from the success of Transition Gas.

Transition Gas should not be confused for an energy source. It has been dreamt up by the marketing departments of the same oil companies that have funded campaigns to deny the existence of climate change. The industry needs to come clean and admitTransition Gas is a marketing term. In its many forms – conventional; coal seam; shale; or even natural – Transition Gas is exactly the same fuel molecule by molecule as plain old fossil fuel gas. It is the same fuel that leaks significant amounts of climate dam

ABC Environment: Two-faced climate policy


Credit: Mick Tsikas (Reuters)

It's ironic that Australia is moving toward a 'cap' on carbon emissions because while we've got this paper target for a five per cent reduction in carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions by 2020 we've also got the foot on the accelerator and running in overdrive expanding the coal and gas mining at an unprecedented rate.

Australia is on target to increase CO2 emissions originating from our shores by over 400 per cent. It's a simple trick of accounting: claim a five per cent reduction by ignoring our fossil fuels that are burnt off shore.

This approach of saying one thing while doing another isn't new to politics, but normally doesn't keep currency with the population for so long. Trumpeting supposed carbon action while quadrupling our carbon emissions is a complete farce and has been going on for half a decade.

Amongst a population of 20 million, Australia has a very high level of climate denialism when compared to the political will and actions of 300 million people in Europe.

The difference is that we currently have a "national imperative" to issue as many coal and gas extraction licenses as possible before the world wakes up and will not buy our dirty energy.

Media Release: Solar: IPART recommends NSW power rip off


The failure to recognize the contribution that rooftop solar systems make to the national energy supply, is ripping off all Australians, says leading renewable energy think-tank Beyond Zero Emissions.

BZE’s Executive Director Mathew Wright, urges the NSW government not to follow the recent decision by the NSW Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal (IPART), which will see solar power owners losing thousands on the value of their purchases.

"All electricity consumers should be very worried at the rip off being perpetrated by IPART.  All New South Wales electricity consumers will be ripped off whether they install solar panels or not as all consumers benefit with lower bills thanks to solar, not just the owners
of systems", says Matthew Wright.

IPART solar feed-in tariffs report

Australia's twist in the wind


Denmark's renewable energy achievements and its ambitious targets demonstrate a serious plan to lead the world in tackling global climate and energy security. Wind turbine technology will power half of its plan.

At the end of last year, Denmark announced that it will increase its share of wind power in the electricity supply mix from 25 per cent, its total today, to 50 per cent by 2020. The earlier plan was to do the same, but by 2025.

Denmark's bullish drive towards wind energy comes from the public’s ongoing strong support for the industry and technology. Over one million Danes currently live within one kilometre of an operating wind farm. Many of these wind farms are being, or are scheduled to be, upgraded with newer turbines. This ongoing process of upgrades shows that support for wind energy stays strong in the local vicinity even after communities have lived with a generation of turbines that have served their useful lives.

Solar power as foreign aid - Germany lights the way for the developing world

Germany now has over 30 gigawatts of solar photovoltaic panels on its rooftops. The sheer scale of deployment means that over 4 per cent of the nation's electricity will come from rooftop solar power this year.

This industrial-scale solar rollout, created by Germany's innovative policy support structure, has enabled a significant global research and development environment to thrive, not to mention a massive upscaling and subsequent cost reduction in technology. Not only has Germany gained real emissions reductions from rooftop solar, meaning the country is seriously eating into its carbon liabilities, it has installed enough solar on roofs that doing the same in Australia would be the equivalent of retiring the output of four large coal fired power plants – more than 15 per cent of Australia's total electricity generation.

Syndicate content